Skip to page content

RAOP

Program Structure

The Robotics and Automation Outreach Program (RAOP) combines two weeks of virtual investigation with one week of on-site laboratory experience. Hosted by Howard University’s Autonomous Vehicle, Robotics & Control (AVRC) Laboratory, the program helps STEM educators connect research experience and guided inquiry-based learning with teaching in their schools.

Format

2 weeks virtual + 1 week on-site

2026 Cohort

8 STEM educators

Purpose

Research experience and school integration

2026 Program Sequence

The summer training is complete. Preparation, virtual work, and laboratory rotations formed a connected experience, with classroom integration planning throughout the program.

Before the virtual phase

Preparation and Onboarding

MathWorks approved a STEM Outreach License for MATLAB and Simulink. Access was shared with educators one month before training to support MATLAB Onramp and Simulink Onramp preparation.

  • Verify software and account access.
  • Become familiar with the learning environment and introductory software workflows.
  • Identify technical support needs through T1: Setup Readiness.

July 6–17, 2026

Virtual Research Experience

Eight educators worked in pairs on assigned platform activities using MATLAB, Simulink, and Quanser QLabs digital twins. Guided inquiry-based learning connected predictions, observations, measurements, and explanations.

  • Explore sensors, actuators, and software commands in the virtual environment.
  • Record observations and interpret data with support from the RAOP team.
  • Document virtual activities and possible teaching connections through T2: Virtual Laboratory Checkpoint.

July 20–24, 2026

On-Site Laboratory Experience

Educators rotated through Qube-Servo 3, Aero 2, QArm, and QBot Platform activities in Howard University’s AVRC Laboratory. Supervised investigations connected virtual models with physical equipment.

  • Compare commanded behavior with sensor measurements and physical observations.
  • Document hardware investigations through T3: Hardware On-Site Checkpoint.
  • Reflect on the experience through T4: Participant Feedback and T5: Group Discussion and Classroom Integration Planning.

Learning Across Platforms

Virtual activities were organized in four pairs; on-site rotations gave educators experience with all four core platforms. Qube-Servo 3 introduces DC motor motion, encoders, and feedback. Aero 2 illustrates pitch, yaw, and coupled motion. QArm supports manipulation and joint sensing, while QBot Platform introduces mobile ground robotics and sensing.

Introductory investigations emphasize identifying components, reading measurements, sending commands, collecting data, and explaining system behavior. MATLAB and Simulink support model-based investigation; QUARC supports real-time hardware interfacing. Advanced control theory and forward or inverse kinematics are extensions rather than prerequisites for school-level activities.

Advanced demonstrations included QDrone 2 mission control in the Autonomous Vehicle Research Studio using OptiTrack localization and Motive software. These demonstrations extended awareness of research capabilities beyond the four core platform activities.

Explore platform activities

Assessment and Reflection: T1–T6

The assessment sequence documents preparation, laboratory experience, educator feedback, and advisory recommendations. This evidence informs curriculum refinement and participant support.

RAOP assessment tools, purposes, and timing
ToolFocusTiming and Purpose
T1Setup ReadinessBefore virtual instruction: software access, preparation, and support needs.
T2Virtual Laboratory CheckpointEnd of the virtual phase: activities, observations, explanations, and teaching connections.
T3Hardware On-Site CheckpointEnd of the on-site phase: physical investigations, reflections, and integration plans.
T4Participant FeedbackEnd of the on-site phase: educator experience and suggestions for improvement.
T5Group Discussion and Classroom Integration PlanningJuly 24, 2026: shared reflection, implementation ideas, and anticipated support needs.
T6Advisory Board FeedbackInitial and follow-up reviews: recommendations on program design and refinement.

School Integration and Follow-Up

Educators are encouraged to adapt their learning for courses, curriculum units, after-school activities, and clubs. Planning considers student readiness, available equipment, time, and teaching objectives. The educator guide provides a foundation for an adaptable grades 6–12 curriculum.

Follow-up is planned for October 2026 to document actual or planned school implementation, identify barriers, and determine further support needs. The curriculum will be expanded, evaluated, and refined across five annual cycles.

Participation and Technical Support

  • Complete software preparation and participate in scheduled sessions.
  • Document observations, measurements, and explanations during investigations.
  • Follow laboratory safety procedures during supervised hardware work.
  • Share reflections and develop feasible connections to school teaching.

The RAOP team provides training assistance. Quanser supports the platform learning environment through digital twins, technical resources, and instructional support; MathWorks supports software access through the approved outreach license.

Future cohort dates and participation details will be communicated by the project team.Contact RAOP.

Follow RAOP & stay connected

Program updates, announcements, and educator highlights.

Instagram links to Fadel Lashhab’s profile. Some social platforms may require sign-in.